Generic Maximum
GREAT Generic Maximum DEALS BELOW THE ARTICLES
Cany give me an opinion on a digital camera add-on lens extender (Tele / Wide)?
I see many of them on eBay, but have not yet found an opinion. for the most part, seem to be "brand free", but I see "Digital Optics" again - no small camera or manufacturers of proprietary products however. I know that even with Nikon Nikon Extender on your computer, there's a slight loss of image quality and maximum aperture. I can live with that. I want to know that these lenses are rubbish generic, or poor? (I think best will be fine!). With respect to all photographers (mostly the world take pictures of our day in one form or another), I invite responses to the professional or amateur photographers that I can offer a clearer perspective. Indeed, I'm more interested in a wide-angle conversion angle telephoto angle (though sometimes meet).
Raynox, Tiffen, Hoya and Kenko are trademarks I've heard of the conversion lenses for different brands. Personally, I respect them. They are in standard sizes such as 58mm, 55mm or take a look at the sample Lensmate galleries. They have sample galleries for converters of arms. I do not know if the results are the same in the Nikon. Remember if you use the wrong or a generic converter to a camera, there is always the possibility that you will notice the bullets cut corners. Much depends on the specific form converter between generic and its Macro Teleconverter http://www.lensmateonline.com/newsite/G5G3macro.html model Http: / / www.lensmateonline.com/newsite/S1wide.html IMO, image quality is not bad. You can see in some models, there is some distortion barrrel serious if the scale of focal lengths. In addition, the forums have excellent staff www.DPReview.com knowledgeable of whom probably can give you more knowledge about the first conversion options for Nikon lenses. G'luck!
| Account limit of 2000 requests per hour exceeded. |
